1.160. Effect of repeal of penal statute. — No offense committed and no fine, penalty or forfeiture incurred, or prosecution commenced or pending previous to or at the time when any statutory provision is repealed or amended, shall be affected by the repeal or amendment, but the trial and punishment of all such offenses, and the recovery of the fines, penalties or forfeitures shall be had, in all respects, as if the provision had not been repealed or amended, except (1) that all such proceedings shall be conducted according to existing laws; and (2) that if the penalty or punishment for any offense is reduced or lessened by any alteration of the law creating the offense, the penalty or punishment shall be assessed according to the amendatory law.
--------
(RSMo 1939 § 4861, A.L. 1957 p. 587)
Prior revisions: 1929 § 4468; 1919 § 3709; 1909 § 4920
(1972) Where defendant was convicted of possession of narcotic drug and sentenced to three years imprisonment, his appeal argued and submitted on September 27, 1971, but prior to submission on August 31, 1971, appellant filed “Alternative Motion for Reduction of Sentence” based upon an amendment, effective September 28, 1971, of statute which reduced punishment for his offense to confinement in county jail for not more than one year or fine of $1,000, or both, supreme court remanded cause for assessment of punishment and judgment under the law as amended. State v. Reiley (Mo.), 476 S.W.2d 473.
1972) Where appellant's conviction and sentence for possession of marijuana occurred at a time when the first conviction for that offense was a felony regardless of amount of marijuana involved and while appeal was pending an amendment to the law to make possession of thirty-five grams or less a misdemeanor became effective, the cause was remanded for assessment of punishment under the law as amended. State v. Hawkins (Mo.), 482 S.W.2d 477.
(1974) Held that when license was reinstated prior to effective date of amendatory act providing for elimination of points on reinstatement the act could not be applied retroactively. Ritter v. Schaffner (A.), 504 S.W.2d 207.
---- end of effective 29 Aug 1957 ----
| - All versions | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Effective | End | |||
| 1.160 | 8/28/2005 | |||
| 1.160 | 8/28/1993 | 8/28/2005 | ||
| 1.160 | 8/29/1957 | 8/28/1993 | ||
|
|
|||
| Click here for the Reorganization Act of 1974 - or - Concurrent Resolutions Having Force & Effect of Law | |||
| In accordance with Section 3.090, the language of statutory sections enacted during a legislative session are updated and available on this website on the effective date of such enacted statutory section. |
|
||
|
|
|||
| Recent Sections | Editorials | May Be Cited As | Tables & Forms | Multiple Enact |
| Repeal & Transfer | Definitions | End Report | ||
|
|
||||
| Site changes | Pictures | Contact | ||
| Legislative Research | Oversight | MOLIS | |||
| Library | MO WebMasters |